Lawmakers split on timing of Afghan decision
Republicans want boost in troop levels; Democrats counsel patience
Thousands of Afghan recruits are being trained to join the fight against the Taliban.
updated 8:47 a.m. PT, Sun., Oct . 25, 2009
WASHINGTON - Top lawmakers sparred Sunday over the timing of President Barack Obama's decision on how to move ahead in Afghanistan, with Republicans urging a quick move to boost troop levels and Democrats counseling patience.
In partisan displays, senators generally agreed on the need to support whatever Afghan government emerges from a Nov. 7 run-off election between President Hamid Karzai and challenger Abdullah Abdullah. But they differed on exactly how to do that and when.
Republicans said Obama must sign off soon on a recommendation from the top commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, to substantially increase the number of American troops there by 40,000. Democrats warned against a hasty decision on any increase.
"Clearly, time is of the essence here," said Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona, the second-ranking Republican. "I'm afraid that with every passing day we risk the future success of the mission."
"I think it's taken too long," added Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah. "Why not follow the advice of his hand-picked general?"
‘A rapid decision’
Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee for president last year, said that "every day we delay will be a delay in this strategy succeeding." The deteriorating situation "argues for a rapid decision," he said.
None of the Republicans would second a claim made last week by former Vice President Dick Cheney that Obama is "dithering" in making a decision, but they agreed that continued delay would endanger the 68,000 U.S. soldiers now on the ground in Afghanistan.
"I would never want to call my president dithering," Hatch said. He stressed, though, that "they need these troops, there is no question about it. We're exposing them without the proper help that they have just got to have. ... I think it's a mistake."
Distancing himself from Cheney, McCain also said he "wouldn't use that language." But, he added, "The sooner we implement the strategy the more we will able to ensure their (troops') safety."
Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, lashed out at Cheney's criticism, which came in a speech on Wednesday while accepting an award from a conservative national security group.
"I thought that comments of the former vice president were totally out of bounds," said Levin, D-Mich. "I don't think he has any credibility left with the American people in any event. But I think it is really wrong. ... The president needs to make the right decision."
In addition to differing on the timing of the decision, lawmakers were divided over on what it should be. Republicans wholeheartedly endorsed McChrystal's appeal while Democrats were more skeptical.
‘Prevent this mistake’
Levin, who has urged that the Afghan security forces be built up before any increase in U.S. combat troops, said "it would be a mistake to have any significant number of additional combat forces because I would like to see a large increase in the Afghan army be the major way in which this is successful."
Click for related content
U.S. service member killed in Afghanistan blast
Cheney: Stop ‘dithering’ on Afghanistan troops
Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., was more strident, saying he is against a build up of American forces.
"It is time to start thinking about bringing troops out of Afghanistan and reducing our commitment there," he said. He pledged to oppose a decision to send more.
"There will be resistance to this if necessary," Feingold said. "If necessary, we will act to prevent this mistake."
Kyl and Levin spoke on "Fox News Sunday," Hatch and Brown were on CNN's "State of the Union," and Feingold and McCain appeared on CBS's "Face the Nation."