You are not connected. Please login or register

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

SSC


Admin
Obama opens door to prosecutions on interrogations
Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:05pm


Obama open to torture prosecutions
www.reuters.com

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama opened the door on Tuesday to possible prosecutions of U.S. officials who laid the legal groundwork for harsh interrogation of terrorism suspects during the Bush administration.

Obama also said he would not necessarily oppose an effort to pursue a "further accounting" or investigation into the Bush-era interrogation program that included waterboarding, sleep deprivation, forced nudity, shoving people into walls and other methods.

That marked a shift for the Obama administration, which has emphasized it does not want to dwell on the past with lengthy probes into policies put in place by President George W. Bush after the September 11, 2001 attacks.

But pressure in the U.S. Congress is growing for a full-blown investigation of the CIA interrogation program.

Controversy has erupted across the political spectrum over last week's release by the Obama administration of classified memos detailing the program to question al Qaeda suspects.

Human rights groups say tactics such as waterboarding -- a form of simulated drowning -- constituted torture and violated U.S. and international laws. Conservative critics contend Obama has endangered the country by releasing CIA secrets.

REPORT SAYS TACTICS SPREAD TO IRAQ

A congressional report released late on Tuesday traced how a Bush-era policy on interrogation at the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, helped set the stage for detainee abuse at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and in Afghanistan. The report may add impetus to calls for a wider probe.

In the Abu Ghraib scandal, low-ranking U.S. soldiers were convicted of abuses after photos surfaced of them abusing Iraqi prisoners.

But the report, released by Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, laid blame for the abuses on former Vice President Dick Cheney, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and other top Bush administration officials.

"The report represents a condemnation of both the Bush administration's interrogation policies and of senior administration officials who attempted to shift the blame for abuse -- such as that seen at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay and Afghanistan -- to low-ranking soldiers," Levin said.

"It was senior civilian leaders who set the tone."

Earlier, in an Oval Office question-and-answer session with reporters, Obama reiterated his vow not to prosecute CIA interrogators who relied in good faith on legal opinions from the Bush administration condoning the harsh methods.

However, Obama did not rule out charges against those who wrote the opinions justifying the methods used on captured terrorism suspects.

"With respect to those who formulated those legal decisions, I would say that is going to be more of a decision for the attorney general within the parameters of various laws, and I don't want to prejudge that," Obama said after meeting Jordan's King Abdullah.

"I think that there are a host of very complicated issues involved there," Obama said.

The comment seemed at odds with the position offered on Sunday by Obama's chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, who told ABC that the president did not believe the authors of the legal opinions should be prosecuted.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs brushed aside questions about the contradiction. "Instead of referring to what anybody might have said ... it's important to refer to what the president said," he said.

While human rights advocates have urged prosecutions for those involved in the interrogation program, Obama has received scathing criticism from some conservatives over the release of the memos detailing the harsh methods.

Among the most outspoken critics has been Cheney, who contends the questioning yielded valuable information about terrorist activities and has accused Obama of endangering the country by releasing the CIA memos.

But Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the Democratic head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, welcomed Obama's comments about a possible inquiry as a "step forward."

Feinstein has urged Obama to withhold judgment on possible prosecutions pending a closed-door review by her committee of the interrogation program.

Obama said he would not necessarily oppose a U.S. panel to investigate the interrogation program.

But he said he would prefer to see such an inquiry take place outside of the "typical hearing process" of the U.S. Congress, where the issue could become politicized.

Guest


Guest
Reverand Jeremiah Wright said it best "The chickens have come home to roost". The bashers have their religion (Bush must die) and they won't give it up regardless of the damage they will certainly cause. Let's see now, I think the last time the CIA was gutted the islamists started blowing up our embassies,ships,and office buildings. One wonders how they'll top that next time around. Oh well.

SSC


Admin
Obama is making a terrible mistake, I agree Moon, wonder what horrific happening this will cause.

Guest


Guest
SSC wrote:Obama is making a terrible mistake, I agree Moon, wonder what horrific happening this will cause.
This is a very real threat. I sometimes wonder if Obama/Pelosi live in our world. This mea culpa crap is dangerous as hell. We must assume good intentions are being pursued but I see this: 1.Obama is keeping up the pressure in NW Pakistan against the Taliban. Great,but any fool knows this will beg a response from these murderous terrorists and they have PUBLICLY THREATENED REVENGE! We know they will act. 2.Has this increased pressure been matched with an increased vigilance here in the USA? NO! Obama is shucking,jiving,bowing, and kissing foreign ass. The message? "We sorry. We good now. Please don't hurt us". Pathetic and stupid. I'm not good at predictions,but I won't be surprised if we see another major act of terrorism soon. They are motivated,well financed, and have been given the moral high ground. I had high hopes for Obama when he got elected,but this is Jimmy Fool Carter all over again.

Sponsored content


View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum